Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential · Texas

M&M Weatherization Company

San Antonio, TX · ~39 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M&M Weatherization Company runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential workplace, earning a grade C.

M&M Weatherization Company: 3.4 TCR = 89% of Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M&M Weatherization Company safety composite

M&M Weatherization Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2018→2024

M&M Weatherization Company injury rate improved

M&M Weatherization Company's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.0 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/28
  • PHOTO 7578_18435
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 7578_18435 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

M&M Weatherization Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M&M Weatherization Company averages 3.4 TCR (89% of the Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M&M Weatherization Company TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=6 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where M&M Weatherization Company falls in its industry

698 Remodeling and renovating gene establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 28 Remodeling and renovating gene employers in Texas.

M&M Weatherization Company (39 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate M&M Weatherization Company
M&M Weatherization Company (39 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

M&M Weatherization Company has fewer employees than the Remodeling and renovating general contra median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2021 7.4 3.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · TX · San Antonio

698 Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 7578_18435 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR EngineHouse 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PREMIER BUILDING SOLUTIONS INC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MFIB 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Descanso Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dumas 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy - Wink TX 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE FAR SOUTH MINING LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR The Higbee Company, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Humphreys County Nursing Center 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SC Voc Rehab Sumter 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Spring Green 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE K&M Tire Detroit 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Upper Lakes Foods Inc 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Todd Transit Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breakthru Beverage South Carolina - Myrtle Beach 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.