Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation · South Carolina

SC Voc Rehab Sumter

Sumter, SC · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SC Voc Rehab Sumter runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation workplace, earning a grade C.

SC Voc Rehab Sumter: 3.4 TCR = 89% of Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SC Voc Rehab Sumter safety composite

SC Voc Rehab Sumter scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.8

2018→2024

SC Voc Rehab Sumter injury rate improved

SC Voc Rehab Sumter's TCR fell 15.8 from 15.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=15.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Sumter, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/33
  • PHOTO Elizabethville Store
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elizabethville Store (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

SC Voc Rehab Sumter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SC Voc Rehab Sumter averages 3.4 TCR (89% of the Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SC Voc Rehab Sumter TCR series: 2018=15.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where SC Voc Rehab Sumter falls in its industry

1,455 Job training, vocational rehab establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 33 Job training, vocational rehab employers in South Carolina.

SC Voc Rehab Sumter (26 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SC Voc Rehab Sumter
SC Voc Rehab Sumter (26 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

SC Voc Rehab Sumter has fewer employees than the Job training, vocational rehabilitation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 15.8 3.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · SC · Sumter

1,455 Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 130 employers in Sumter, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elizabethville Store 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VIA, Visually Impaired Advancement 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supor Blvd 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custodial Services 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms SC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Simpsonville Operations Center 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Savage Rd. Crew Quarters 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Construction Group 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Tuomey 1,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumter Utilities, Inc. 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Tire the Americas LLC - Sumter Plant 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR MJ Associates Philadelphia 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Swedesboro, NJ - Berkley Drive 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Humphreys County Nursing Center 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR M&M Weatherization Company 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE meador boys express 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Biddeford Store 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kls Usg Nj 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lutherville Office 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.