Electrical contractors · Missouri

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric

Columbia, MO · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric: 3.3 TCR = 117% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric safety composite

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2023

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric injury rate improved

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Columbia, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 117% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #59/87
  • PHOTO DAKOTA ELECTRIC SERV…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DAKOTA ELECTRIC SERVICE INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric averages 3.3 TCR (117% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 87 Electrical contractors employers in Missouri.

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric (26 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric
MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric (26 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric has fewer employees than the Electrical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 12.9 12.9 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · MO · Columbia

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 270 employers in Columbia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DAKOTA ELECTRIC SERVICE INC. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anvil Power 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PECI SHOP 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knob Noster Pullets 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE MO96-SEL-HIGHWAY 96- HENS' 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO Hwy 96 006-0138-96, 9G 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Belton Service Cetner 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Equipmentshare.com, Inc. 5,242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mortgage Research Center 2,903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boone Hospital Center 1,562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 684 FTE
NAT-TCR Kirkhill Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Feeding America Eastern Wisconsin 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RLH Construction 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Petersburg Family YMCA 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guy Tabacco Construction 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Station #4 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCB Installation Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 141-Canyon Lake/Sattler Rd 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.