Electrical contractors · Pennsylvania

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group

Hazleton, PA · ~126 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group: 3.3 TCR = 117% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group safety composite

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2022→2024

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group injury rate improved

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group's TCR fell 3.4 from 6.6 in 2022 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Hazleton, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 117% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #108/191
  • PHOTO DAKOTA ELECTRIC SERV…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DAKOTA ELECTRIC SERVICE INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group averages 3.3 TCR (117% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group TCR series: 2022=6.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 2.8

Where George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 191 Electrical contractors employers in Pennsylvania.

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group (126 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group
George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group (126 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

George J Hayden Inc., DBA Hayden Power Group has more employees than the Electrical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.0 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.6 5.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · PA · Hazleton

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 79 employers in Hazleton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DAKOTA ELECTRIC SERVICE INC. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anvil Power 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MME, Inc. dba Mid Missouri Electric 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PECI SHOP 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Modern Mushroom Farms, Inc. 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Reading 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forcine Concrete & Construction Co. Inc. 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE BQ Philadelphia 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - AVP1 2,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Case Ready Hazleton PA 872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lehigh Valley Hospital - Hazleton 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR LVH-Hazleton 722 FTE
NAT-TCR Pioneer Products, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Novant Health Huntersville Medical Center 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RaynGuard Protective Materials, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Fort Myers Cape Coral 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Arc of Vigo County 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weaver Bros. Inc. Main Plant 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marker, Inc. 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Hardwoods - Longview 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.