Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Mn Gastro Plymouth

Plymouth, MN · ~71 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mn Gastro Plymouth runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Mn Gastro Plymouth: 1.6 TCR = 43% of Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mn Gastro Plymouth safety composite

Mn Gastro Plymouth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2022

Mn Gastro Plymouth injury rate improved

Mn Gastro Plymouth's TCR fell 1.7 from 3.3 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Plymouth, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 43% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #58/419
  • PHOTO 36 Lincoln Avenue
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 36 Lincoln Avenue (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mn Gastro Plymouth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mn Gastro Plymouth averages 1.6 TCR (43% of the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mn Gastro Plymouth TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Mn Gastro Plymouth falls in its industry

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices ( establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 419 Gastroenterologists' offices ( employers in Minnesota.

Mn Gastro Plymouth (71 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mn Gastro Plymouth
Mn Gastro Plymouth (71 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mn Gastro Plymouth has more employees than the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., cent median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 1.8 0.0 0 1 0
2016 3.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Plymouth

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 321 employers in Plymouth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 36 Lincoln Avenue 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rural Health Group HRMC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR *Einstein Plymouth Meeting 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mayo Clinic Health System-Oakridge (Mondovi) 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fagen, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donlar Construction Company 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanson Silo Company 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Service LLC 3,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP SH Plymouth MN 2,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP / SH Plymouth MN 1,982 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Plymouth 1,565 FTE
NAT-TCR US - Distribution Center Network : 0946 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4370 Rogers Container 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites Birmingham Airport 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0304 Claxton Poultry Farms Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crossroads Care Center 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9277-694 Mount Snow - Grand Summit 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 540619-Bhm-Main Office Sta 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1930 VGS - Davison, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.