Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate

Minneapolis, MN · ~503 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate safety composite

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate held a steady TCR band

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.5 in 2023 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.5 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #3/419
  • PHOTO Houston Eye Associat…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~503 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Eye Associates GRAM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate TCR series: 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate falls in its industry

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices ( establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 419 Gastroenterologists' offices ( employers in Minnesota.

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate (503 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate
Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate (503 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mngi Digestive Health - Corporate has more employees than the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., cent median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Minneapolis

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Eye Associates GRAM 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Campbell Clinic - Germantown 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR *Karabots Medical Bldg - Powell St 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR UPNT Arlington 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MINNEAPOLIS SAINT PAUL NDC_1380428 503 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgedale 232 502 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richfield Best Buy Office Bldg 504 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peoplenet Communications Corp Minnetonka 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Liberty Sheet Metal 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Zack Painting Co., Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Viking Industrial 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE PA41010 503 FTE
NAT-SIZE L3Harris 503 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tacoma Screw Products Inc 503 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - TTN2 503 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.