Couriers and Express Delivery Services · Minnesota

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids)

Grand Rapids, MN · ~57 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Couriers and Express Delivery Services workplace, earning a grade D.

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids): 8.9 TCR = 137% of Couriers and Express Delivery Services BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) safety composite

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
C 4.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2019→2023

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) injury rate improved

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids)'s TCR fell 1.1 from 5.6 in 2019 to 4.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.6 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=13.0 · 2022=14.7 · 2023=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Grand Rapids, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.9 · 137% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #61/113
  • PHOTO BOOZ LOGISTICS INC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BOOZ LOGISTICS INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) averages 8.9 TCR (137% of the Couriers and Express Delivery Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) TCR series: 2019=5.6 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=13 · 2022=14.7 · 2023=4.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) falls in its industry

6,679 Couriers and Express Delivery establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 113 Couriers and Express Delivery employers in Minnesota.

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) (57 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids)
Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) (57 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Mngun - Gunn (Grand Rapids) has fewer employees than the Couriers and Express Delivery Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2022 14.7 12.6 7 0 1
2021 13.0 13.0 6 0 0
2020 6.9 4.6 3 0 0
2019 5.6 5.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MN · Grand Rapids

6,679 Couriers and Express Delivery Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Grand Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BOOZ LOGISTICS INC 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elite Xpress LLC 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WACHE - CHEHALIS 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TNDIK - DICKSON PACKAGE CENTER 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCC-Blaine 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shore Track Services 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aid Electric Corporation 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clinic & Hospital 706 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clniic & Hospital 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1609 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1609 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilmington Healthcare 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 8807818-BP/Cabelas 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Forsythe Plumbing & Heating Corporation 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR N.A. Manosh, Inc. 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ornbe - North Bend (Ornbe) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Tower Services, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mishawaka Door, LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mon Elder Services, Inc. (The Village at Heritage Point) 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.