Employer · Missouri

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans

St. Louis, MO · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans runs at 638% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans: 14.0 TCR = 638% of industry BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans safety composite

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans: 4.1 → 24.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 24.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.52× in 2021

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans's TCR rose 19.9 from 4.1 in 2020 to 24.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424420 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.0 · 638% of ind

  • DART 21.3 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO FL-MIAMI01-Miami - F…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FL-MIAMI01-Miami - FL - Dry Bldg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans averages 14.0 TCR (638% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans TCR series: 2020=4.1 · 2021=24 · BLS 2.2

Where MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans falls in its industry

134 industry establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 industry employers in Missouri.

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans (38 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 7.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans
MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans (38 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 7.4

MO-STLOU02-St. Louis - MO - Sales and Trans has fewer employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 24.0 21.3 9 0 0
2020 4.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424420 · MO · St. Louis

134 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FL-MIAMI01-Miami - FL - Dry Bldg 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.J. Distributors LLC-Bloomington Warehouse 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KY-SHEPH01-Shepherdsville - Warehouse Address 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.J. Distributors LLC-Grand Prairie Warehouse 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Webster Electric Cooperative 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Springs Service Center 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR The Colonnade of Carrollwood 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Bi Products Estherville 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Traverse Care Center 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakridge 14.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4769-6266-OUTLETS 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air To Ground Services, Inc.-LA 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Installed Building Products - Tulsa #688 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andersons Upper Sandusky Plant Nutrient 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.