Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Oakridge

Raleigh, NC · ~48 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakridge runs at 369% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakridge: 14.0 TCR = 369% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakridge safety composite

Oakridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2016→2022

Oakridge injury rate improved

Oakridge's TCR fell 7.8 from 11.3 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 24.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.3 · 2017=24.5 · 2019=17.4 · 2020=12.0 · 2021=15.6 · 2022=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Raleigh, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.0 · 369% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #330/356
  • PHOTO THE COLONNADE OF CAR…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: THE COLONNADE OF CARROLLWOOD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Oakridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakridge averages 14.0 TCR (369% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakridge TCR series: 2016=11.3 · 2017=24.5 · 2019=17.4 · 2020=12 · 2021=15.6 · 2022=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakridge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #330 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Oakridge (48 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakridge
Oakridge (48 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakridge has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2021 15.6 3.9 4 0 0
2020 12.0 9.0 3 1 0
2019 17.4 11.6 6 0 0
2017 24.5 6.1 8 0 0
2016 11.3 2.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Raleigh

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR THE COLONNADE OF CARROLLWOOD 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerford Annapolis 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKET NIANTIC OPERATIONS LLC 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand of Prospect OPCO, LLC 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jones Family Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bryan Wagoner Tree Farm LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesville Breeder Operation 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Morganton Hatchery 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Orland Fire Protection District 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 497854-Santa Clara Po 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 161515-Chi-Englewood Sta 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 203852-Hopkinsville Po 14.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Savage Mn Depot 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-AA-MEM-MEMPHIS-MEM-TRML 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leesburg 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gazaway Lumber Company Inc 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.