Community recreation programs, government · Alaska

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance

Anchorage, AK · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance runs at 449% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Community recreation programs, government workplace, earning a grade F.

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance: 14.4 TCR = 449% of Community recreation programs, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance safety composite

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 28.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance: 0.0 → 28.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 28.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance's TCR rose 28.7 from 0.0 in 2023 to 28.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Anchorage, AK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.4 · 449% of ind

  • DART 28.7 DART
  • RANK #27/28
  • PHOTO Balboa Lake Aquatics
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Balboa Lake Aquatics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance averages 14.4 TCR (449% of the Community recreation programs, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=28.7 · BLS 3.2

Where MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs, establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 28 Community recreation programs, employers in Alaska.

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance (27 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance
MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance (27 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance has fewer employees than the Community recreation programs, governmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 28.7 28.7 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · AK · Anchorage

413 Community recreation programs, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 704 employers in Anchorage, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Balboa Lake Aquatics 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shelton Community Center 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Hawk County Conservation 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Francisco Recreation and Park Department 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wally Norenberg Hatchery 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASRC Civil Construction LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103723 - Terror Lake Upper Hidden Basin (Build) 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turnagain Marine Construction Corporation 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000198 4,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR AK10 PROVIDENCE ALASKA MEDICAL CTR-ANCHORAGE 2,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alaska Native Medical Center 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCI Communication Corp. 1,935 FTE
NAT-TCR Seven Mile Casino 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 119 San Antonio 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Irwindale (Covina) 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington SNF Operator LLC 14.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sonesta ES Suites Detroit Warren 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonesta Select Dallas Central Expressway 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utah Valley Peterbilt, Inc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culver 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.