Child day care services · Oregon

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center

Portland, OR · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Child day care services workplace, earning a grade A.

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center: 1.5 TCR = 40% of Child day care services BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center safety composite

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center held a steady TCR band

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624410 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/12
  • PHOTO Diablo Valley Montes…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Diablo Valley Montessori School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center averages 1.5 TCR (40% of the Child day care services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=6 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center falls in its industry

272 Child day care services establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 12 Child day care services employers in Oregon.

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center (22 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center
MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center (22 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 4.7

MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center has fewer employees than the Child day care services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624410 · OR · Portland

272 Child day care services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Diablo Valley Montessori School 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA Loudoun County 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Coordinated Care for Children, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Learning Tree - North 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hammelmans Floral, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Means Nursery Inc (River Road) 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE HASTINGS BULB GROWERS, INC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ekstrom & Schmidt Nursery, LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Compressor 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Collegeville 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Regate Technology, Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ethan Allen Design Center - Novi MI 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ethan Allen Retail, Inc. - Belleville 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Art Van Kildeer 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.