Urethane foam products manufacturing · North Carolina

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point

High Point, NC · ~83 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Urethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Urethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point safety composite

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point: 1.9 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2019

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point's TCR rose 0.7 from 1.9 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #6/39
  • PHOTO Scott Manufacturing …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scott Manufacturing Henderson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Urethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point falls in its industry

474 Urethane foam products manufac establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 39 Urethane foam products manufac employers in North Carolina.

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point (83 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point
Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point (83 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point has more employees than the Urethane foam products manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · NC · High Point

474 Urethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scott Manufacturing Henderson 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pregis- Pomona 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Grand Rapids 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Portage 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ROCKWELL FARMS INC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gastonia Operations Center 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Greensboro 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh-Durham Call Center 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Global Compressor 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MODA Tower YMCA Child Development Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Regate Technology, Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SmartWatt Energy, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bay Path Rehab & Nursing Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntington Place 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE #44 Art Van Lakeside 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE #83 Art Van Alpine 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.