Industrial launderers · Michigan

Model

Grand Rapids, MI · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Model runs at 280% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial launderers workplace, earning a grade F.

Model: 5.9 TCR = 280% of Industrial launderers BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Model safety composite

Model scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Model: 4.8 → 6.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2018

Model's TCR rose 2.1 from 4.8 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812332 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 280% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #22/26
  • PHOTO 4021-A511
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4021-A511 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Model in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Model averages 5.9 TCR (280% of the Industrial launderers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Model TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=6.9 · BLS 2.1

Where Model falls in its industry

917 Industrial launderers establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 26 Industrial launderers employers in Michigan.

Model (40 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Model
Model (40 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Model has fewer employees than the Industrial launderers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.9 2.3 3 0 0
2017 4.8 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812332 · MI · Grand Rapids

917 Industrial launderers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4021-A511 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo, NY 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elite Linen Service 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 250 250-MINNEAPOLIS MN 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Basket Orchards, Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville, MI 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan & Jerrys Pineview Greenhouse LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR South Point 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peerless of America II, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR JX Peterbilt - Wadsworth 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Freeport McMoRan Refinery 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Dominion Distributors (Vending) 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Dominion Distributors (Hopemills) 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nextgen Systems LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #434 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.