Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) · New York

Mohonk Mountain House

New Paltz, NY · ~616 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mohonk Mountain House runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) workplace, earning a grade F.

Mohonk Mountain House: 6.8 TCR = 227% of Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mohonk Mountain House safety composite

Mohonk Mountain House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mohonk Mountain House: 5.2 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 8.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2024

Mohonk Mountain House's TCR rose 3.4 from 5.2 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · New Paltz, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 227% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #280/403
  • PHOTO Birch Bay Resort & S…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 308 inj
  • SIZE ~616 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Birch Bay Resort & Sales (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Mohonk Mountain House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mohonk Mountain House averages 6.8 TCR (227% of the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mohonk Mountain House TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=7 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 3.0

Where Mohonk Mountain House falls in its industry

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #280 safest of 403 Alpine skiing facilities with employers in New York.

Mohonk Mountain House (616 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mohonk Mountain House
Mohonk Mountain House (616 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Mohonk Mountain House has more employees than the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 7.3 45 1 0
2023 8.7 6.5 42 1 0
2022 8.8 6.9 37 4 0
2021 7.0 5.4 32 0 0
2020 5.8 5.0 22 0 0
2019 6.0 3.7 36 1 0
2018 5.6 5.1 32 0 0
2017 5.4 4.1 32 0 0
2016 5.2 3.1 30 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NY · New Paltz

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 29 employers in New Paltz, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Birch Bay Resort & Sales 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hotel Zaza Austin Downtown 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2969 ES SANTA CLARA-SILICON VALLEY CA 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Julien Hotel & Spa 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aurubis Buffalo, Inc. 616 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCB Piezotronics 617 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roberts Wesleyan College 617 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brooklyn Regional Office 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodland Pond, Inc. 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT SUNY-HASBROUCK DINING HALL 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR new paltz 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tops #532 154 FTE
NAT-TCR Las-Technical Operations 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Frontier Distributing 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Azalea Heights 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Xanitos EVS at Pottstown Hospital Tower Health 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE TX_El Paso_1359 Lomaland Drive_54835001 616 FTE
NAT-SIZE JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes 616 FTE
NAT-SIZE BVMP 616 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lighthouse Electric Company, Inc. 616 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.