PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing · Tennessee

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility

Knoxville, TN · ~475 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility: 0.3 TCR = 10% of PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility safety composite

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility injury rate improved

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Knoxville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK P89
  • PHOTO 867
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~475 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 867 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility falls in its industry

242 PET (positron emission tomogra establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility (475 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility
Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility (475 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Molecular Imaging - Knoxville Facility has more employees than the PET (positron emission tomography) scann median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.6 0.2 3 0 0
2019 0.4 0.2 2 0 0
2018 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.8 0.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · TN · Knoxville

242 PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 747 employers in Knoxville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 867 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MECC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medtronic MECC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EP SH Plymouth MN 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Cheese Company, Inc. - Manchester 475 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flowers Bakery of Crossville, LLC. 476 FTE
STATE-SIZE 35370 - PULASKI PLANT 474 FTE
STATE-SIZE Havco Wood Products, LLC. 476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cellular Sales Services Group LLC 6,387 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health System, Inc 5,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Functional Pathways of TN LLC 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR HES Facilities Services K-12 2,157 FTE
NAT-TCR QSI Bridgewater 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BASS Electric 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Integrity Electric Incorporated 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Behr Paint Company Kutztown Distribution 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elmhurst Park Distirct 475 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gila County Government 475 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITW FEG Traulsen Kairak 475 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSA Terminals Terminal 18 475 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.