Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Florida

Molex St. Petersburg

St. Petersburg, FL · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Molex St. Petersburg runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Molex St. Petersburg: 5.0 TCR = 152% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Molex St. Petersburg safety composite

Molex St. Petersburg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Molex St. Petersburg: 1.4 → 11.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.71× in 2024

Molex St. Petersburg's TCR rose 10.0 from 1.4 in 2017 to 11.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · St. Petersburg, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 152% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Remke Industries
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Remke Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Molex St. Petersburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Molex St. Petersburg averages 5.0 TCR (152% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Molex St. Petersburg TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2019=12.4 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=11.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Molex St. Petersburg falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Florida.

Molex St. Petersburg (43 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Molex St. Petersburg
Molex St. Petersburg (43 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Molex St. Petersburg has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.4 8.6 3 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 12.4 12.4 4 1 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · FL · St. Petersburg

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 170 employers in St. Petersburg, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Remke Industries 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Vernon Facility 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Incon Inc 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE PINTO'S FARM 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fernlea Nurseries - STU 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRP Boca Raton Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stuart Office 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital 3,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSN Headquarters 3,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Hospital (1105) 2,597 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Design Inc 2,047 FTE
NAT-TCR Stericycle - St. Louis,MO 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Alb Reeves Station 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brothers 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TCH Oakdale 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Victory Sign Industries 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wasilla AK Yard 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fayette County Sheriff's Office 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE R29IF - MN Interagency Fire Center 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.