Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · New Jersey

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab

Warren, NJ · ~140 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab: 5.1 TCR = 155% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab safety composite

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2020→2024

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab injury rate improved

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab's TCR fell 4.1 from 8.3 in 2020 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=8.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Warren, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 155% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Remke Industries
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Remke Industries (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab averages 5.1 TCR (155% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab TCR series: 2020=8.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=5 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in New Jersey.

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab (140 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab
HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab (140 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 1.7 5 0 0
2023 5.4 0.0 7 0 0
2022 5.0 2.1 4 3 0
2021 2.7 1.3 4 0 0
2020 8.3 7.6 1 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · NJ · Warren

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 24 employers in Warren, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Remke Industries 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex St. Petersburg 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Incon Inc 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Vernon Facility 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plant 02 - SH 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orora Visual New Jersey 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robertet Frangrances 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contract Filling Inc 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSK Consumer Health Care US Headquarters 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haleon US Holdings, LLC (formerly GSK Consumer Healthcare) 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haleon US Holdings, LLC (formerly GSK Consumer Healthcare) Field and Remote 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR II-VI OED Warren 252 FTE
NAT-TCR Phoenix Wood Products Ocala 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Colquitt Ag Services, Inc 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wesley Woods Geriatric Hosp - 1817 - EHC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmetto Residential Electric LLC North Charleston Warehouse 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mat Holdings Inc. - GRIE 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homeview Health and Rehab 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain Hershey Ogden 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE HEWLETT-NY55 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.