Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing · Texas

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151)

Fort Worth, TX · ~58 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing workplace, earning a grade B.

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151): 3.5 TCR = 60% of Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) safety composite

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2019→2021

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) injury rate improved

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151)'s TCR fell 6.9 from 6.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #512/846
  • PHOTO Kuehne + Nagel Inc. …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (TOA-6617) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) averages 3.5 TCR (60% of the Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) TCR series: 2019=6.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) falls in its industry

9,477 Motor Freight Transportation A establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #512 safest of 846 Motor Freight Transportation A employers in Texas.

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) (58 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151)
Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) (58 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Mondelez Fort Worth DSD. (SMRU13151) has fewer employees than the Motor Freight Transportation And Warehou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.9 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Fort Worth

9,477 Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (TOA-6617) 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ops 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MRC Polymers, Inc. - Romeoville 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 6022 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston MC Care Properties, LLC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE 20440 Houston(Hansen) 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Texas Thrift- Harlingen 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Get Fresh Produce - Houston 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR MMF 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LEH 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Embassy Suites Auburn Hills 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR T. T. Barge Services, Mile 237 LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sl Start & Associates, LLC - Coeur D'Alene Id 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Region 2 -Corvallis 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hall's Calf Ranch 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE LTC, Inc. 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.