Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing · Georgia

Mondi Bags USA, LLC

Eastman, GA · ~132 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mondi Bags USA, LLC runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Mondi Bags USA, LLC: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mondi Bags USA, LLC safety composite

Mondi Bags USA, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2017→2024

Mondi Bags USA, LLC injury rate improved

Mondi Bags USA, LLC's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.9 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322220 · Eastman, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #4/14
  • PHOTO ITW ShineMark a divi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ITW ShineMark a division of Illinois Tool Works Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Mondi Bags USA, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mondi Bags USA, LLC averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mondi Bags USA, LLC TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Mondi Bags USA, LLC falls in its industry

349 Paper Bag and Coated and Treat establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 14 Paper Bag and Coated and Treat employers in Georgia.

Mondi Bags USA, LLC (132 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mondi Bags USA, LLC
Mondi Bags USA, LLC (132 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Mondi Bags USA, LLC has more employees than the Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper M median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2021 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 4 0 0
2018 1.9 1.3 3 0 0
2017 2.9 1.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322220 · GA · Eastman

349 Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 12 employers in Eastman, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ITW ShineMark a division of Illinois Tool Works Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paterson Pacific Parchment 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richwood Novolex Plant 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaverton 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas G 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgia Feed 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lonesome Oak Trading Co. - Bldg 365 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1018 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1018 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Healthcare and Rehab 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valence Surface Technologies Eastman Operations 95 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EI102 - Central Region Headquarters 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR P. Agnes, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitchell SD Truss 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA IL Moline Plant 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wrigley Field 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Downstream & Chemicals - Port Arthur, TX Lubricants Plant 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE State College 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.