Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · Pennsylvania

P. Agnes, Inc.

Philadelphia, PA · ~101 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

P. Agnes, Inc. runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial and Institutional Building Construction workplace, earning a grade A.

P. Agnes, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 48% of Commercial and Institutional Building Construction BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

P. Agnes, Inc. safety composite

P. Agnes, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

P. Agnes, Inc.: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

P. Agnes, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Philadelphia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #49/251
  • PHOTO Barton Malow Holding…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barton Malow Holdings, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

P. Agnes, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows P. Agnes, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (48% of the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

P. Agnes, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 2.9

Where P. Agnes, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial and Institutional B establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 251 Commercial and Institutional B employers in Pennsylvania.

P. Agnes, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate P. Agnes, Inc.
P. Agnes, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

P. Agnes, Inc. has more employees than the Commercial and Institutional Building Co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.6 0.0 3 0 0
2019 3.6 1.2 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Philadelphia

4,692 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barton Malow Holdings, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6021088 - Sand Island WWTP Secondary Treatment Phase 1 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ala-Season, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR IDL Contracting Services LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE IA Construction Corporation 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klover Sepa Inc 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Glass and Metal Co., Inc. 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hazleton Office 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Mitchell SD Truss 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EI102 - Central Region Headquarters 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mondi Bags USA, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Utilities 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southcoast Cabinet Shops 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jeff Belzer New Prague Chevrolet 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jeff Belzer New Prague Ford 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.