Solid Waste Facility Landfill · California

Monterey Regional Waste Management District

Marina, CA · ~121 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monterey Regional Waste Management District runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Solid Waste Facility Landfill workplace, earning a grade F.

Monterey Regional Waste Management District: 6.1 TCR = 236% of Solid Waste Facility Landfill BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monterey Regional Waste Management District safety composite

Monterey Regional Waste Management District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Monterey Regional Waste Management District: 1.0 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2023

Monterey Regional Waste Management District's TCR rose 8.7 from 1.0 in 2021 to 9.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Marina, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.1 · 236% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #24/41
  • PHOTO S04247 - Columbia Ri…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S04247 - Columbia Ridge Landfill Recycling Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Monterey Regional Waste Management District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Monterey Regional Waste Management District averages 6.1 TCR (236% of the Solid Waste Facility Landfill BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Monterey Regional Waste Management District TCR series: 2021=1 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=9.7 · BLS 2.6

Where Monterey Regional Waste Management District falls in its industry

288 Solid Waste Facility Landfill establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 41 Solid Waste Facility Landfill employers in California.

Monterey Regional Waste Management District (121 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Monterey Regional Waste Management District
Monterey Regional Waste Management District (121 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Monterey Regional Waste Management District has more employees than the Solid Waste Facility Landfill median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.7 7.3 10 2 0
2022 7.7 5.1 9 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · CA · Marina

288 Solid Waste Facility Landfill employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 18 employers in Marina, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S04247 - Columbia Ridge Landfill Recycling Center 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03957 - Butterfield Station Landfill 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pike County Facility 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seneca Landfill, Inc. 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Naumann Ranch 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illume Agriculture, LLC 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Miramar Yard 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Collier Road Complex 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4488 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4488 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2306 - Marina 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridge House 128 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Industrial Door Company 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Smt Industries 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dakota Metal Fabrication 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Court at Round Rock 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shepherd of the Hills Development, LLC 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Landscaping 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE 21 Main North Beach LLC 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems Inc. 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.