Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Montgomery Truss

Grove City, PA · ~96 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Montgomery Truss runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Montgomery Truss: 10.7 TCR = 324% of Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Montgomery Truss safety composite

Montgomery Truss scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

Montgomery Truss injury rate improved

Montgomery Truss's TCR fell 3.5 from 9.7 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 20.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=16.0 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=20.7 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Grove City, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 324% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Homestead Building S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Homestead Building Systems, LLC - Orange (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Montgomery Truss in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Montgomery Truss averages 10.7 TCR (324% of the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Montgomery Truss TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=8 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=16 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=20.7 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Montgomery Truss falls in its industry

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m employers in Pennsylvania.

Montgomery Truss (96 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Montgomery Truss
Montgomery Truss (96 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Montgomery Truss has more employees than the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 2.1 6 0 0
2023 20.7 7.4 14 0 0
2022 8.1 1.4 6 0 0
2020 16.0 2.5 19 0 0
2019 9.2 6.4 10 0 0
2018 7.7 3.8 8 0 0
2017 8.0 4.0 8 0 0
2016 9.7 7.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · PA · Grove City

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 40 employers in Grove City, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Homestead Building Systems, LLC - Orange 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Site Built, LLC (dba Atlantic Prefab) 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NJP 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2019 Automated Products, Inc. 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Longenecker's Hatchery, Inc. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardmore PA 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zartman 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE G W Peoples Contracting Co., Inc. 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Services Supply Chain Operations : Grove City, PA 585 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grove City Engine 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wabtec Grove City Engine 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR UX-Grove City, PA 430 FTE
NAT-TCR Masonicare Health Center 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Darling Ingredients Inc., Bastrop 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Welding & Manufacturing 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fife 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mader Construction Co. Inc. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Oregon Cardiology 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Care and Rehabilitation Center 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Broccoli 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.