Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Oregon

Southern Oregon Cardiology

Medford, OR · ~96 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southern Oregon Cardiology runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Southern Oregon Cardiology: 3.0 TCR = 78% of Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southern Oregon Cardiology safety composite

Southern Oregon Cardiology scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Southern Oregon Cardiology injury rate improved

Southern Oregon Cardiology's TCR fell 3.1 from 8.3 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.3 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Medford, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 78% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #20/34
  • PHOTO Bozeman Clinic and S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bozeman Clinic and Surgery Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Southern Oregon Cardiology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southern Oregon Cardiology averages 3.0 TCR (78% of the Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southern Oregon Cardiology TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=1 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.3 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Southern Oregon Cardiology falls in its industry

2,836 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 34 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., employers in Oregon.

Southern Oregon Cardiology (96 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Southern Oregon Cardiology
Southern Oregon Cardiology (96 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Southern Oregon Cardiology has more employees than the Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 4.0 2 2 0
2022 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2018 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2017 3.5 2.4 2 1 0
2016 8.3 1.2 1 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · OR · Medford

2,836 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 250 employers in Medford, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bozeman Clinic and Surgery Center 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allina Health Chaska Clinic 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0320 ST PAUL COMO CLINIC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PN1X MPLS PN CLINIC AIRPORT 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE A & R Spada Farms, LLC 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bountiful Farms Nursery 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tillamook P.U.D. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirby Nagelhout Construction Co. Bend Office 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harry and David Operations Inc 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR343 PROVIDENCE MEDFORD MEDICAL CENTER HR 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000590 1,130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithia Motors Support Services 677 FTE
NAT-TCR Rink Printing Company 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health- Midwest Distribution Center 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mg Wholesale 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montgomery Truss 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mader Construction Co. Inc. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Care and Rehabilitation Center 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Broccoli 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.