Nuclear Electric Power Generation · Minnesota

Monticello Nuclear Plant

Monticello, MN · ~430 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monticello Nuclear Plant runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Monticello Nuclear Plant: 0.3 TCR = 24% of Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monticello Nuclear Plant safety composite

Monticello Nuclear Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2020

Monticello Nuclear Plant injury rate improved

Monticello Nuclear Plant's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.4 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Monticello, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Pilgrim Nuclear Powe…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~430 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Monticello Nuclear Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Monticello Nuclear Plant averages 0.3 TCR (24% of the Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Monticello Nuclear Plant TCR series: 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Monticello Nuclear Plant falls in its industry

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generat establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Nuclear Electric Power Generat employers in Minnesota.

Monticello Nuclear Plant (430 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Monticello Nuclear Plant
Monticello Nuclear Plant (430 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Monticello Nuclear Plant has fewer employees than the Nuclear Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.4 0.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · MN · Monticello

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 70 employers in Monticello, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Constellation Nuclear Headquarters at Cantera 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duane Arnold 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL Plant St Lucie 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michels Utility Services Inc-MN-Ostego 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loram Maintenance of Way (Corporate Office) 431 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN100 431 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3404 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dist Office 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monticello High School 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCH Monticello 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Monticello 487 FTE
NAT-TCR CHI Northern Kentucky Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelnet - Burleson 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CITGO Refinery Lemont IL - BSL 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsboro 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE BioLegend Way 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheriff 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain-EG1 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Awg - Norfolk 430 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.