Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid · Vermont

Montpelier Hauling

Montpelier, VT · ~90 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Montpelier Hauling runs at 394% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid workplace, earning a grade F.

Montpelier Hauling: 10.3 TCR = 394% of Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Montpelier Hauling safety composite

Montpelier Hauling scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2023

Montpelier Hauling injury rate improved

Montpelier Hauling's TCR fell 1.4 from 7.7 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=15.2 · 2018=17.1 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=8.5 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Montpelier, VT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 394% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO AWS-Delaware
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AWS-Delaware (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Vermont employers → · Look up another →

Montpelier Hauling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Montpelier Hauling averages 10.3 TCR (394% of the Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Montpelier Hauling TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=15.2 · 2018=17.1 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=8.5 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=6.4 · BLS 2.6

Where Montpelier Hauling falls in its industry

2,322 Waste hauling, local, nonhazar establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Vermont alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Waste hauling, local, nonhazar employers in Vermont.

Montpelier Hauling (90 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Montpelier Hauling
Montpelier Hauling (90 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Montpelier Hauling has more employees than the Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.4 4.6 6 1 0
2022 8.7 7.9 10 0 0
2021 8.5 6.6 9 0 0
2020 8.5 6.4 7 1 0
2019 9.8 7.6 9 0 0
2018 17.1 17.1 15 0 0
2017 15.2 9.3 13 0 0
2016 7.7 5.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · VT · Montpelier

2,322 Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,065 rated employers in Vermont with headcount on file · 18 employers in Montpelier, VT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AWS-Delaware 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenville Hauling Operations and Transfer Station 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henderson Transfer Station 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR S10330 - WI MARSHFIELD 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Against the Grain Gourmet LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carris Reels VT 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mack Molding Company - Cavendish 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-000001324 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR The State of Vermont 9,477 FTE
CITY-NEAR State of Vermont 9,450 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunger Mountain Cooperative, Inc. 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Mountain Behavior Consulting, Inc. 125 FTE
NAT-TCR Reliant Processing-Guymon Plant 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North 40 Outfitters #3 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Old Europe Cheese, Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Quail Park of Lynnwood 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holland Construction Services, Inc 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ventura Transfer Company 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashby Lumber 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roundup Memorial Healthcare 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.