Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing · California

Moog AP West

Mountain View, CA · ~38 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moog AP West runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Moog AP West: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moog AP West safety composite

Moog AP West scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Moog AP West held a steady TCR band

Moog AP West's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Mountain View, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/45
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation US AK Anderson Clear AFS (5433) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Moog AP West in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moog AP West averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moog AP West TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Moog AP West falls in its industry

388 Aeronautical systems and instr establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 45 Aeronautical systems and instr employers in California.

Moog AP West (38 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Moog AP West
Moog AP West (38 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Moog AP West has fewer employees than the Aeronautical systems and instruments man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · CA · Mountain View

388 Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 151 employers in Mountain View, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AK Anderson Clear AFS (5433) 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAES Systems LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Space and Airborne Systems : MD, Columbia - 7130 Columbia Gtwy Dr (SAS-IC) 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Communication Systems : VA, Forest - 12860 E Lynchburg-Salem Tpk (CS-PSPC) 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waymo HQ 1,846 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waymo RLS 1,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30806) 1,158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-30331) 999 FTE
NAT-TCR Loescher Heating & Air Conditioning Co. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rand Construction Corporation 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Powers of Arkansas- NWA Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bailey Harris Construction Co., Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lantower South Side on Lamar 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheyenne Commons 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curtis-McKinley Roofing & Sheet Metal Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Architectural Metals Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.