Electrical Contractor · North Dakota

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI)

Fargo, ND · ~138 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electrical Contractor workplace, earning a grade B.

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI): 1.9 TCR = 69% of Electrical Contractor BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) safety composite

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2018

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) injury rate improved

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI)'s TCR fell 2.4 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Fargo, ND AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #9/20
  • PHOTO Fisk Electric Compan…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fisk Electric Company - Miami, FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) averages 1.9 TCR (69% of the Electrical Contractor BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical Contractor establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 20 Electrical Contractor employers in North Dakota.

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) (138 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI)
Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) (138 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Moorhead Electric, Inc (MEI) has more employees than the Electrical Contractor median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2017 3.1 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · ND · Fargo

4,550 Electrical Contractor employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fisk Electric Company - Miami, FL 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GLS Electric Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atwater Yard 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Electrical Systems Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2693 Hornbacher's Village West 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 6385 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purity Midwest Headquarters 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marvin Distribution Center - West Fargo 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR Oak Creek - Aldi 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5243 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cincinnati One Hour Heating and Air 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Powderhorn Ski Co LLC 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avante at Jacksonville Beach 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Bay (Wigre) 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newark (Ohnew) 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.