Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution · Missouri

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC

St. Louis, MO · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC: 1.9 TCR = 161% of Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC safety composite

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC: 0.0 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 3× in 2018

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC's TCR rose 5.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 161% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #27/127
  • PHOTO Rusk County Electric…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rusk County Electric Cooperative (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC averages 1.9 TCR (161% of the Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.8 · BLS 1.2

Where AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Transmission, C establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 127 Electric Power Transmission, C employers in Missouri.

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC (38 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC
AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC (38 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC has fewer employees than the Electric Power Transmission, Control, an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MO · St. Louis

2,958 Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rusk County Electric Cooperative 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTH DALLAS TRANSMISSION 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Electric Cooperative Services Burleson 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snowflake 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Webster Electric Cooperative 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Springs Service Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meter Shop 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Cincinnati One Hour Heating and Air 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5243 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Creek - Aldi 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MidCo Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Conner Chester Plant 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE AW ALF Ops CO, LLC D/B/A LakeWest Assisted Living 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trumbull-Great Lakes-Ruelin, A Joint Venture 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta East Sheet Plant 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.