Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational · Minnesota

Moorhead Workforce Center

Moorhead, MN · ~68 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moorhead Workforce Center runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational workplace, earning a grade F.

Moorhead Workforce Center: 10.5 TCR = 276% of Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moorhead Workforce Center safety composite

Moorhead Workforce Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.6

2017→2024

Moorhead Workforce Center injury rate improved

Moorhead Workforce Center's TCR fell 20.6 from 20.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 59.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=20.6 · 2018=59.7 · 2019=15.2 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=12.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Moorhead, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 276% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/58
  • PHOTO Goodwill Mayfield St…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodwill Mayfield Store (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Moorhead Workforce Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moorhead Workforce Center averages 10.5 TCR (276% of the Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moorhead Workforce Center TCR series: 2017=20.6 · 2018=59.7 · 2019=15.2 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=12.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Moorhead Workforce Center falls in its industry

1,455 Rehabilitation job counseling establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 58 Rehabilitation job counseling employers in Minnesota.

Moorhead Workforce Center (68 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Moorhead Workforce Center
Moorhead Workforce Center (68 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Moorhead Workforce Center has more employees than the Rehabilitation job counseling and traini median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 12.4 6.2 2 0 0
2022 6.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 12.6 0.0 2 0 0
2020 6.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 15.2 0.0 2 1 0
2018 59.7 5.4 4 7 0
2017 20.6 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · MN · Moorhead

1,455 Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Moorhead, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Mayfield Store 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEPS Main Office 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jerome Ave 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powell Store 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stearns Electric Association 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Federal Contracting Group 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wm Mueller & Sons Inc 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University Moorhead 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Moorhead 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eventide on Eighth 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Crystal Sugar Company Moorhead 387 FTE
NAT-TCR Connersville Middle School 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Killingworth 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Inca Sardis 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CHEP East Syracuse Service Center (UT73) 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Calaveras County Water District 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE BBA 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE PBV-Elizabeth City 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pea River Electric Cooperative 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.