Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Oregon

Mooseport Delivery, LLC

Fairview, OR · ~55 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mooseport Delivery, LLC runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

Mooseport Delivery, LLC: 10.0 TCR = 222% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mooseport Delivery, LLC safety composite

Mooseport Delivery, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 6.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mooseport Delivery, LLC: 10.0 → 140.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 140.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2023

Mooseport Delivery, LLC's TCR rose 130.0 from 10.0 in 2022 to 140.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Fairview, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 222% of ind

  • DART 20.0 DART
  • RANK #4/29
  • PHOTO SPEE-DEE DELIVERY SE…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPEE-DEE DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. - SIOUX FALLS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Mooseport Delivery, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mooseport Delivery, LLC averages 10.0 TCR (222% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mooseport Delivery, LLC TCR series: 2022=10 · 2023=140 · BLS 4.5

Where Mooseport Delivery, LLC falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 29 Delivery service (except as pa employers in Oregon.

Mooseport Delivery, LLC (55 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Mooseport Delivery, LLC
Mooseport Delivery, LLC (55 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Mooseport Delivery, LLC has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 140.0 20.0 7 0 0
2022 10.0 6.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · OR · Fairview

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 25 employers in Fairview, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPEE-DEE DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. - SIOUX FALLS 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-NBNC 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZWAY 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZWTR 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roseburg Resources OR 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&G Logging & Construction 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babb Construction Co dba Delta Construction Co 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siegmund Excavation & Construction / Allied Rock 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Corporation 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairview 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1406 - Fairview 180 FTE
NAT-TCR Times Supermarket Liliha 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Plating Inc 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Portillo's Hot Dogs, LLC #910 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR American Red Cross - 365 Harry L Dr 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Simi Base - Bld: 0743 - 15 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE A-Korn Roller, Inc. 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Wood Recycling Inc. - Austin 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pelican Products - NonoCool Holdings LLC 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.