Engineering research and development laboratories or services · Oregon

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon

Fairview, OR · ~288 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade F.

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon: 1.6 TCR = 324% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon safety composite

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2023

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon injury rate improved

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.8 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Fairview, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.6 · 324% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO Corteva - Marion, IA
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~288 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corteva - Marion, IA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon averages 1.6 TCR (324% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Engineering research and devel employers in Oregon.

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon (288 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon
Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon (288 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon has more employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 1.5 6 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 1 1 0
2021 1.5 0.8 2 2 0
2020 2.3 1.9 7 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2017 1.1 0.7 3 0 0
2016 2.8 1.4 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · OR · Fairview

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 25 employers in Fairview, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corteva - Marion, IA 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR C6-NC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10 Tyler Street 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Attune Foods 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE NuScale Power, LLC. 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Coast Seafood 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5839 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Corporation 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairview 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1406 - Fairview 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moore Excavation Inc. 176 FTE
NAT-TCR Infrastructure Alternatives Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Finishing 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hardcastle Specialties Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Conair - Franklin 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nutra Blend - Neosho 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Famarock dba Rockenwagner 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE RGG Gainesville Plant 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-4190 EAGLE HILL DRIVE 288 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.