Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground · California

Moreno Trencing, Ltd.

Rio Vista, CA · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moreno Trencing, Ltd. runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground workplace, earning a grade D.

Moreno Trencing, Ltd.: 4.1 TCR = 148% of Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moreno Trencing, Ltd. safety composite

Moreno Trencing, Ltd. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Moreno Trencing, Ltd.: 2.0 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2020

Moreno Trencing, Ltd.'s TCR rose 4.5 from 2.0 in 2017 to 6.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Rio Vista, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 148% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #93/147
  • PHOTO PA035 - Pauley Const…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PA035 - Pauley Constr Colorado Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Moreno Trencing, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moreno Trencing, Ltd. averages 4.1 TCR (148% of the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moreno Trencing, Ltd. TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=6.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Moreno Trencing, Ltd. falls in its industry

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 147 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele employers in California.

Moreno Trencing, Ltd. (73 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Moreno Trencing, Ltd.
Moreno Trencing, Ltd. (73 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Moreno Trencing, Ltd. has fewer employees than the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, el median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.4 4.8 4 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 6.4 3.2 4 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Rio Vista

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 8 employers in Rio Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PA035 - Pauley Constr Colorado Springs 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR STC:SC300 - SC300-Birmingham, AL 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEI Engineering & Construction, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Q2 Fiber Communications Inc 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Columbia 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms Inc/Palomate Inc 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 557 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Endive Farms 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lira's Supermarket 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lindsay Transportation Solutions 48 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Phoenix Downtown Ballpark 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Good Samaritan Hospice - Community 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Park Drive Practices 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Topre America Corporation- OH 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eastview Manor Care Center 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Discover Goodwill of Southern and Western Colorado- Leap 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE HVAC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE NOG Heller, LLC 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.