Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground · California

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc

Fremont, CA · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground workplace, earning a grade D.

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc: 4.2 TCR = 149% of Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc safety composite

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc: 0.0 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2023

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc's TCR rose 8.3 from 0.0 in 2022 to 8.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Fremont, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 149% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #94/147
  • PHOTO Lighting & Construct…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lighting & Construction Services, Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Q2 Fiber Communications Inc averages 4.2 TCR (149% of the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=8.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Q2 Fiber Communications Inc falls in its industry

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 147 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele employers in California.

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc (22 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Q2 Fiber Communications Inc
Q2 Fiber Communications Inc (22 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Q2 Fiber Communications Inc has fewer employees than the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, el median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.3 4.2 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Fremont

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lighting & Construction Services, Warehouse 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walnut Ridge Wind 16141018 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Storey Solar Project 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEI Engineering & Construction, LLC 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR Gamco Corporation New York 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SARAH SENECA Residential Services, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-098-Radford ( RK-098 ) 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lynden Main/C-Store/Farm Store 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aztec Steel 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE R Winfield 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Weld Cty School Dst Cust Acqui 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Habitat for Humanity of York County 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.