Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Tennessee

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford

Chattanooga, TN · ~59 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford runs at 359% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford: 13.7 TCR = 359% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford safety composite

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford: 7.3 → 20.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 20.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.49× in 2017

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford's TCR rose 12.8 from 7.3 in 2016 to 20.1 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Chattanooga, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 359% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #87/100
  • PHOTO Watermark at Contine…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Watermark at Continental Ranch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford averages 13.7 TCR (359% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=20.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford (59 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford
Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford (59 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Morning Pointe of Chattanooga at Shallowford has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 20.1 6.7 8 1 0
2016 7.3 4.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TN · Chattanooga

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Watermark at Continental Ranch 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Cliffs Senior Living 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Residences at Thomas Circle 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVERY PLACE 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Erwin Utilities Authority 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landmark Construction 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Group Inc. EMTN Construction 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campbell Construction, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Spokane - 845 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR All Service Plumbing Service/Maintenance and Air Services HVAC Service/Maintenance 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mobile Work Group 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gateway Health Care Centre, LLC 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aerobraze OKC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Save - Koloa 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE SC300 - Birmingham 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oldcastle OPI - Telford 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.