Retirement communities, continuing care · District of Columbia

The Residences at Thomas Circle

Washington, DC · ~131 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residences at Thomas Circle runs at 359% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residences at Thomas Circle: 13.7 TCR = 359% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residences at Thomas Circle safety composite

The Residences at Thomas Circle scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Residences at Thomas Circle: 16.3 → 27.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 63.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2024

The Residences at Thomas Circle's TCR rose 11.2 from 16.3 in 2016 to 27.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 63.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Washington, DC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 359% of ind

  • DART 17.5 DART
  • RANK P15
  • PHOTO White Cliffs Senior …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 90 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: White Cliffs Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

The Residences at Thomas Circle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residences at Thomas Circle averages 13.7 TCR (359% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residences at Thomas Circle TCR series: 2016=16.3 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=14.3 · 2020=19.1 · 2022=63.1 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=27.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residences at Thomas Circle falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
The Residences at Thomas Circle (131 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residences at Thomas Circle
The Residences at Thomas Circle (131 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Residences at Thomas Circle has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 27.5 17.5 8 3 0
2023 0.1 0.1 1 10 0
2022 63.1 63.1 4 6 0
2020 19.1 1.8 21 0 0
2019 14.3 8.8 18 0 0
2018 11.3 3.8 12 0 0
2017 6.9 4.3 8 0 0
2016 16.3 4.5 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · DC · Washington

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR White Cliffs Senior Living 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVERY PLACE 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fostrian Court Assisted Living 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watermark at Continental Ranch 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trader Joe's 0662 Washington 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4021-510463500 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE WGL DC - WGL Corporate HQ 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE B. Frank Joy LLC 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Bethesda Children's Home 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR White Cliffs Senior Living 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Raulerson Hospital 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AZP043 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Canam Steel Corp 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trinity Rail Maintenance Services #4036 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Last Frontier Casino 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE NHC Healthcare Hendersonville 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.