Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Maryland

Morningside House of Friendship

Hanover, MD · ~88 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Morningside House of Friendship runs at 471% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Morningside House of Friendship: 17.9 TCR = 471% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Morningside House of Friendship safety composite

Morningside House of Friendship scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Morningside House of Friendship held a steady TCR band

Morningside House of Friendship's TCR held near 0.3 from 15.8 in 2017 to 16.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 26.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.8 · 2018=19.4 · 2020=22.0 · 2022=26.4 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=16.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Hanover, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.9 · 471% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #81/87
  • PHOTO American House - Jen…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American House - Jenison (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Morningside House of Friendship in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Morningside House of Friendship averages 17.9 TCR (471% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Morningside House of Friendship TCR series: 2017=15.8 · 2018=19.4 · 2020=22 · 2022=26.4 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=16.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Morningside House of Friendship falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 87 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Morningside House of Friendship (88 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Morningside House of Friendship
Morningside House of Friendship (88 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Morningside House of Friendship has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.1 8.9 9 0 0
2023 7.5 5.0 3 0 0
2022 26.4 12.3 14 1 0
2020 22.0 8.3 15 1 0
2018 19.4 9.0 13 0 0
2017 15.8 6.6 10 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MD · Hanover

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 121 employers in Hanover, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American House - Jenison 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Addison of Pleasant Prairie 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bell Tower Retirement Community 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MorningStar at Ridgegate 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 104648 - WMATA Contract 3 Blue/Green Lines 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gordon Contractors Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayoka Services, LLC 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR PPE Casino Resorts Maryland d/b/a Live! Casino & Hotel 2,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keller North America Inc. 2,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ciena - Remote workers 1,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEAPOD HANOVER WAREHOUSE 1,556 FTE
NAT-TCR Kingsburg Center 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Togiak Fisheries 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Diva 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Echo Park Pool 17.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keith Huber Corporation 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Binghamton Precast & Supply Corp. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Process Equipment Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solar Atmospheres Inc. 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.