Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Morningside of Sumter

Sumter, SC · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Morningside of Sumter runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Morningside of Sumter: 10.3 TCR = 272% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Morningside of Sumter safety composite

Morningside of Sumter scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

12/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 28.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Morningside of Sumter: 6.2 → 32.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 32.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.79× in 2020

Morningside of Sumter's TCR rose 25.9 from 6.2 in 2017 to 32.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sumter, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 272% of ind

  • DART 28.9 DART
  • RANK #74/107
  • PHOTO Ascot Park Senior Li…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ascot Park Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Morningside of Sumter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Morningside of Sumter averages 10.3 TCR (272% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Morningside of Sumter TCR series: 2017=6.2 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=32.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Morningside of Sumter falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Morningside of Sumter (34 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Morningside of Sumter
Morningside of Sumter (34 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Morningside of Sumter has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 32.1 28.9 0 10 1
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2017 6.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Sumter

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 130 employers in Sumter, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ascot Park Senior Living 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wickshire West Lafayette 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Fortuna 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE TLG TURF 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArborGen Inc. Headquarters 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Operations Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marlboro Electric Cooperative Headquarters Office 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Construction Group 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Tuomey 1,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumter Utilities, Inc. 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Tire the Americas LLC - Sumter Plant 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR Sonesta ES Suites Cleveland Airport 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SPO 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Recleim PA LLC 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MVG Business LLC 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Fountains Assisted Living 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie Estates Care Center and WEL-Life at Elk Point 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake in Wood Rv Resort 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lafayette LA 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.