Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living

Bend, OR · ~69 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living: 10.3 TCR = 272% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living safety composite

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−30.5

2016→2022

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living injury rate improved

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living's TCR fell 30.5 from 34.2 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 34.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=34.2 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=17.0 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bend, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 272% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #119/218
  • PHOTO Ascot Park Senior Li…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ascot Park Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living averages 10.3 TCR (272% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=34.2 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=17 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #119 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living (69 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living
Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living (69 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Mt. Bachelor Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2021 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2020 17.0 17.0 1 11 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.7 10.7 7 0 0
2017 3.2 1.6 9 1 0
2016 34.2 34.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Bend

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 254 employers in Bend, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ascot Park Senior Living 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wickshire West Lafayette 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Sumter 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Fortuna 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE 601 Suburban Door Tualatin 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATI Cast Products Salem Operations 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cummins Battery Systems North America LLC 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Health System Bend 3,592 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mt. Bachelor 569 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Health System Redmond 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonza Bend Inc, 438 FTE
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-01725 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 515406-Lynchburg Po 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 352250-Dobbs Ferry Po 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 358178-Sti-New Dorp Sta 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 807 American Petroleum 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal CT -Adel CT 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG177 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2967-PA94 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.