Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities · Delaware

Mosaic Newark

Newark, DE · ~308 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mosaic Newark runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Mosaic Newark: 2.8 TCR = 73% of Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mosaic Newark safety composite

Mosaic Newark scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Mosaic Newark injury rate improved

Mosaic Newark's TCR fell 1.8 from 4.5 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=1.9 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Newark, DE AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Spelios
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~308 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spelios (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Delaware employers → · Look up another →

Mosaic Newark in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mosaic Newark averages 2.8 TCR (73% of the Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mosaic Newark TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=1.9 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Mosaic Newark falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Delaware alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Intellectual and developmental employers in Delaware.

Mosaic Newark (308 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mosaic Newark
Mosaic Newark (308 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Mosaic Newark has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.0 12 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 4 0 0
2022 2.6 1.6 10 0 0
2021 3.0 2.7 11 0 0
2020 2.4 2.1 4 4 0
2018 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2017 4.3 3.7 7 0 0
2016 4.5 1.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · DE · Newark

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,487 rated employers in Delaware with headcount on file · 221 employers in Newark, DE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spelios 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Work, Community, Independence, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality South Inc 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingsport Admin Unit 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Chemours Company, FC LLC - Chemours Discovery Hub 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0246 - CHRISTIANA DE WHSE 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE AstraZeneca Newark Facility 294 FTE
STATE-SIZE TA Instruments- New Castle 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR 50 Christiana 11,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newark Site 1,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR DE00000042 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES - NEWARK 1,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR DuPont Electronic Materials 653 FTE
NAT-TCR Integra Construction, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne NJ 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR York Facility 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sherman TX FXFE-SHM 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Enterprise - Boston Logan Airport All branches (1021/10Y1/10Y2/10Y3/10Y6) 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE Romac Industries Inc 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Clinic, APMC 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unlimited Care, Inc. Bronx, NY 308 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.