Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Washington

Moses Lake Container Plant

Moses Lake, WA · ~122 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moses Lake Container Plant runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Moses Lake Container Plant: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moses Lake Container Plant safety composite

Moses Lake Container Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Moses Lake Container Plant: 1.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2020

Moses Lake Container Plant's TCR rose 0.6 from 1.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Moses Lake, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #9/21
  • PHOTO Pacific Quality Pack…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacific Quality Packaging Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Moses Lake Container Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moses Lake Container Plant averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moses Lake Container Plant TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Moses Lake Container Plant falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 21 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Washington.

Moses Lake Container Plant (122 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Moses Lake Container Plant
Moses Lake Container Plant (122 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Moses Lake Container Plant has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2018 5.5 3.6 6 0 0
2017 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2016 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · WA · Moses Lake

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 89 employers in Moses Lake, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacific Quality Packaging Corp. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Georgetown Container Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KALAMAZOO, MI HEXACOMB 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt Industries, Allentown Corrugated, LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE King Organics Inc 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE America's Finest Fishing LLC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV American Dynasty 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stacy and Witbeck/Kuney, A Joint Venture - Redmond Link Extension 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terex Washington Moses Lake 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moses Lake, WA 672 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Hospital (DBA Samaritan Healthcare) 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Hospital 497 FTE
NAT-TCR The TES Group, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JR Automation Technologies, LLC Stevensville, MI 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hanover Foods, Centre Hall PA 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Operations 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pathfinder Inspections & Field Services 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Grand Prairie 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.