Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical Use · California

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical Use workplace, earning a grade C.

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical Use BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs safety composite

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs held a steady TCR band

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Santa Fe Springs, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/18
  • PHOTO Hutchinson Body Seal…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hutchinson Body Sealing Systems (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical Use BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs falls in its industry

266 Rubber Product Manufacturing f establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 18 Rubber Product Manufacturing f employers in California.

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs
Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Motion Systems : Santa Fe Springs has fewer employees than the Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechani median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

266 Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical Use employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Body Sealing Systems 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN Rubber & Plastics HQ 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAWSON MANUFACTURING CO 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Motion Systems : Youngstown 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Damick Enterprises Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ncdam - Scs Durham - Xxxx 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aim Integrated Logistics Imperial Dade 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.