Emergency road services (i.e., tow service) · California

Motor Body Company, Inc.

San Jose, CA · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Motor Body Company, Inc. runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Emergency road services (i.e., tow service) workplace, earning a grade B.

Motor Body Company, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 55% of Emergency road services (i.e., tow service) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Motor Body Company, Inc. safety composite

Motor Body Company, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Motor Body Company, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Motor Body Company, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488410 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/48
  • PHOTO Shaner Enterprises, …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shaner Enterprises, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Motor Body Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Motor Body Company, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (55% of the Emergency road services (i.e., tow service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Motor Body Company, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Motor Body Company, Inc. falls in its industry

157 Emergency road services (i.e., establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 48 Emergency road services (i.e., employers in California.

Motor Body Company, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Motor Body Company, Inc.
Motor Body Company, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Motor Body Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Emergency road services (i.e., tow servi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 8.6 5.8 3 0 1
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488410 · CA · San Jose

157 Emergency road services (i.e., tow service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shaner Enterprises, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HB Towing Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Houston HQ 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Serco - Alexandria, VA 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sean V. Doherty Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanco Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SHOP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood Farms 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Somerpointe Realty 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR St Louis Sov 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sealstrip Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR S04315 - Conway Hauling 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eden Prairie Office 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sentry Electric, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #139 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE PJ Smith Electrical Contractors 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.