Skilled nursing facilities · Utah

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center

Salt Lake City, UT · ~84 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center: 10.8 TCR = 166% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2018→2022

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 39.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.4 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=39.3 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.8 · 166% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/65
  • PHOTO Discovery Village at…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Discovery Village at Tampa Palms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center averages 10.8 TCR (166% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2018=6.4 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=39.3 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 65 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Utah.

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center (84 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center
Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center (84 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mount Olympus Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 39.3 36.6 4 25 0
2019 6.8 4.1 5 0 0
2018 6.4 6.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · UT · Salt Lake City

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Discovery Village at Tampa Palms 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morgan Hill Healthcare Center 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Greylock Extended Care Facility 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mountain View Mushrooms 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Sheet Metal 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tops Products 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building 2C 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Brogan Landscaping, Inc.- Central Region 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelson Mfg. shop 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashley Manor Care Center 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HG475 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1706 Travis IH35 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE RMB Products 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rest & Water 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE H-E Parts International, Mining Solutions USA 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.