Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · New Hampshire

Mount Prospect Academy

Plymouth, NH · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mount Prospect Academy runs at 504% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade F.

Mount Prospect Academy: 19.2 TCR = 504% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mount Prospect Academy safety composite

Mount Prospect Academy scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mount Prospect Academy: 19.2 → 8000.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8000.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Mount Prospect Academy's TCR rose 7980.8 from 19.2 in 2016 to 8000.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Plymouth, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.2 · 504% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Mountain View 1 and 2
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mountain View 1 and 2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Mount Prospect Academy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mount Prospect Academy averages 19.2 TCR (504% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mount Prospect Academy TCR series: 2016=19.2 · 2024=8000 · BLS 3.8

Where Mount Prospect Academy falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Intellectual and developmental employers in New Hampshire.

Mount Prospect Academy (50 employees, TCR 19.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mount Prospect Academy
Mount Prospect Academy (50 employees, TCR 19.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Mount Prospect Academy has fewer employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8000.0 0.0 2 0 0
2016 19.2 16.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NH · Plymouth

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 23 employers in Plymouth, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mountain View 1 and 2 19.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DHS-Glenwood Resource Center 19.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unity Center 19.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exeter Road 19.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Rochester 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE RESIN SYSTEMS CORP 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saint-Gobain Crystals 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeastern Sheet Metal, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Speare Memorial Hospital 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #86 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2758 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT PLYMOUTH STATE UNIV. PROSPECT 194 FTE
NAT-TCR Kepco, Inc 19.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Finnmark Property Services-SEA 19.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Annapolis 19.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-Ea-Sba-Santa Barbara-Sba-Trml 19.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kinefac Corporation 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winter Park 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Court at Round Rock 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Customer Call Center 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.