Employer · Colorado

Raytheon_Aurora_CO

Aurora, CO · ~2,237 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raytheon_Aurora_CO runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Raytheon_Aurora_CO: 0.2 TCR = 6% of industry BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raytheon_Aurora_CO safety composite

Raytheon_Aurora_CO scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Raytheon_Aurora_CO held a steady TCR band

Raytheon_Aurora_CO's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.3 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Aurora, CO AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/23
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~2,237 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Raytheon_Aurora_CO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raytheon_Aurora_CO averages 0.2 TCR (6% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raytheon_Aurora_CO TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Raytheon_Aurora_CO falls in its industry

388 industry establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 23 industry employers in Colorado.

Raytheon_Aurora_CO (2,237 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Raytheon_Aurora_CO
Raytheon_Aurora_CO (2,237 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Raytheon_Aurora_CO has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.3 0.1 6 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.1 0.1 2 0 0
2020 0.1 0.1 2 0 0
2019 0.4 0.1 8 0 0
2018 0.2 0.0 5 0 0
2017 0.2 0.0 5 0 0
2016 0.3 0.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · CO · Aurora

388 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 497 employers in Aurora, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3Harris Technologies INC Rodes Campus 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Systems : Grand Rapids, MI 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell International Inc 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frontier Airlines - Denver Base 2,189 FTE
STATE-SIZE WAH - East and West 2,183 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Joseph Hospital 2,293 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Colorado 6,663 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primoris Renewable Energy 1,695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN5 1,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center of Aurora South 1,597 FTE
NAT-TCR 61st Street Service Corporation (NJ) 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Constructors, Inc. Main Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 200 Building 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems St. Petersburg 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
NAT-SIZE main facility 2,237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iladd - Addison a Building 2,237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenheck Fan Corporation 2,237 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.