Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New Jersey

Movement Logistics LLC

Lyndhurst, NJ · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Movement Logistics LLC runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Movement Logistics LLC: 3.2 TCR = 49% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Movement Logistics LLC safety composite

Movement Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2022→2023

Movement Logistics LLC injury rate improved

Movement Logistics LLC's TCR fell 3.3 from 4.8 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.8 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Lyndhurst, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 3.2 · 49% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #36/211
  • PHOTO Buckeye HUB
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Buckeye HUB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Movement Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Movement Logistics LLC averages 3.2 TCR (49% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Movement Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=4.8 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Movement Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 211 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in New Jersey.

Movement Logistics LLC (61 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Movement Logistics LLC
Movement Logistics LLC (61 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Movement Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2022 4.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NJ · Lyndhurst

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 38 employers in Lyndhurst, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Buckeye HUB 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HLO1 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 462410001 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 28860002 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jersey City 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic City NJ 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mike Fitzpatrick Equipment Company 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 213-NY-New York City 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJLDH - LYNDHURST 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR ShopRite of Lyndhurst 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Interstate Drywall Corp. 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sika - Lyndhurst 245 FTE
NAT-TCR ATI Performance Products 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-City United High School 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arthrex Manufacturing South Carolina 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR New Perspective Franklin 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nakatetsu Machining Technologies, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brentwood Industries Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veazey Enterprises, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE UBE Machinery, Inc. 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.