Genetics research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) · California

MP Biomedicals

Irvine, CA · ~127 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MP Biomedicals runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Genetics research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade C.

MP Biomedicals: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Genetics research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MP Biomedicals safety composite

MP Biomedicals scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MP Biomedicals held a steady TCR band

MP Biomedicals's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.0 TCR.

2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541715 · Irvine, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/6
  • PHOTO Center for Research …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Center for Research & Technology (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

MP Biomedicals in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MP Biomedicals averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Genetics research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MP Biomedicals TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where MP Biomedicals falls in its industry

47 Genetics research and developm establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 6 Genetics research and developm employers in California.

MP Biomedicals (127 employees, TCR 0.0) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 232 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,00020,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate MP Biomedicals
MP Biomedicals (127 employees, TCR 0.0) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 232 employees and a TCR of 0.9

MP Biomedicals has fewer employees than the Genetics research and development labora median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541715 · CA · Irvine

47 Genetics research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 622 employers in Irvine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Center for Research & Technology 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rho 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ethicon US Somerville 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Cherry Hill Exec Campus (1834) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Christensen & Giannini LLC 1588 Moffett St., Ste B 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hokto Kinoko Company 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Booth Ranches LLC - BR2 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3019_5835 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine 16,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-10 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Lifesciences 4,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson MDD CSS Irvine 3,775 FTE
NAT-TCR Gaapr - Ups Supply Chain Solutions 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Other Location 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Putzel Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TXC101551 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Whitehead Electric Company 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE IC Coachways Inc. 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Seneca 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Prairie Container 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.