Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Brookdale San Jose

San Jose, CA · ~127 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale San Jose runs at 611% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale San Jose: 23.2 TCR = 611% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale San Jose safety composite

Brookdale San Jose scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Brookdale San Jose held a steady TCR band

Brookdale San Jose's TCR held near 0.2 from 7.1 in 2017 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 43.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.1 · 2018=9.5 · 2020=38.1 · 2021=25.7 · 2022=43.9 · 2023=30.9 · 2024=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 23.2 · 611% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #207/216
  • PHOTO River View Asssited …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: River View Asssited Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale San Jose in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale San Jose averages 23.2 TCR (611% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale San Jose TCR series: 2017=7.1 · 2018=9.5 · 2020=38.1 · 2021=25.7 · 2022=43.9 · 2023=30.9 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale San Jose falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #207 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Brookdale San Jose (127 employees, TCR 23.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale San Jose
Brookdale San Jose (127 employees, TCR 23.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Brookdale San Jose has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 6.3 6 1 0
2023 30.9 29.8 4 25 0
2022 43.9 37.5 6 35 0
2021 25.7 18.5 9 16 0
2020 38.1 36.3 8 34 0
2018 9.5 6.1 11 0 0
2017 7.1 4.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · San Jose

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR River View Asssited Living 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Decatur Manor, LLC 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Management Group LLC 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Island Bickford 23.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Christensen & Giannini LLC 1588 Moffett St., Ste B 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hokto Kinoko Company 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Booth Ranches LLC - BR2 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3019_5835 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0518 Warwick 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SA Operations, LLC dba St Ann's Skilled Nursing and Therapy 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR River View Asssited Living 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZLEL 23.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Garden Landscaping 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fertile Beltrami School District 599 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. Waimea 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Royal Oak - Police Department 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.