Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Missouri

M&R Plating,Inc

Washington, MO · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M&R Plating,Inc runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

M&R Plating,Inc: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M&R Plating,Inc safety composite

M&R Plating,Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2023

M&R Plating,Inc injury rate improved

M&R Plating,Inc's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=10.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Washington, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO Dixie Electro Plating.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dixie Electro Plating. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

M&R Plating,Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M&R Plating,Inc averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M&R Plating,Inc TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=10.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where M&R Plating,Inc falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Electroplating metals and form employers in Missouri.

M&R Plating,Inc (28 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate M&R Plating,Inc
M&R Plating,Inc (28 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

M&R Plating,Inc has fewer employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.9 0.0 3 0 0
2016 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MO · Washington

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 62 employers in Washington, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dixie Electro Plating. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heidtman Steel Products Inc.-granite City 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana Pickling and Processing Company, Loc'n 332 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleanpart Southwest 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Hills 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOPV-SEL-PRAIRIE VIEW - LAYING HEN' 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE State Line Combined Cycle 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations - South 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL WASHINGTON 1,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Instrumentation : Washington SPO215 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fluid Connectors : Washington SPO215 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 172 398 FTE
NAT-TCR Freund-Vector Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Davis Motor Crane Service, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheridan Books, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mill-Rite Woodworking Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zeco Machine Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Empire Fibreglass Products, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Mount Vernon Drive 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robinson and Sons Construction Services, Inc. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.