General warehousing and storage · Alabama

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT)

Huntsville, AL · ~72 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT): 0.7 TCR = 11% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) safety composite

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2018

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) injury rate improved

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT)'s TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Huntsville, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/102
  • PHOTO PCWC Ontario
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PCWC Ontario (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) averages 0.7 TCR (11% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=0 · BLS 5.8

Where MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 102 General warehousing and storag employers in Alabama.

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) (72 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT)
MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) (72 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

MS - Huntsville, AL - 1RAA2 (CFT FIELD DIRECT) has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · AL · Huntsville

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 454 employers in Huntsville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PCWC Ontario 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schenker Inc. Mars-Redlands 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 3736 - Landover,MD 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PDX-Main 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Alabama Specialty Hospital 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gary Ingram Grading & Paving, Inc 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brown Nursing Home, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomasville Lumber Company, Inc. 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR AL004 2,929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dynetics A Leidos Company 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leidos - Dynetics 2,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Motor Mfg of Alabama 1,874 FTE
NAT-TCR Action Resources - Charlotte 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Round Rock Construction 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 42007 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Childress Klein 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holland - SI 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canfield & Tack 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dimensions in Screen Printing 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarion Wellness & Rehabilitation 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.